The San Francisco decision is troubling because it shifts the burden of pollution prevention from the permit holder to the ...

That’s why behavioral economics can be so useful in tackling pernicious health problems. It allows us to preserve people’s ...

Scholars reflect on the continuing impact of the No Surprises Act.

The Supreme Court weighs public safety concerns surrounding ghost guns in recent Second Amendment decision.

The Supreme Court validates political control over public health decisions.

The Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision on FDA’s tobacco-authorization authority is utterly unremarkable.

It is time we introduce “Humanity’s Best Exam”—a benchmark that strives to capture a model’s capacity to address public ...

Authorization for FEMA’s search and rescue response to the Texas floods took over 72 hours, and some teams arrived a week ...

Kennedy, a case that concerns how hospitals that treat a large share of low-income patients are paid by the Medicare program.

The Supreme Court preserves preventive services coverage but emboldens the HHS Secretary.

Scholars consider the antitrust implications of advances in AI-driven algorithmic pricing.

Lawrence O. Gostin discusses the importance of equity and science in the face of threats to global health security.