Gerard Butler's heist movie that earned more at the box office than its sequel begins streaming for free soon. Find out where ...

A sequel to the Gerard Butler 2018 heist thriller, Den of Thieves 2 performed similarly to the original. The first instalment, released by STX, opened with US$15.2-million seven years ago.

SUNDAY AM WRITETHRU after Saturday update…Lionsgate can relish a No. 1 win in Den of Thieves 2: Pantera this weekend which is now on its way to $15.5M opening, which is $300K more than the start of ...

Den of Thieves, the first entry in the heist thriller series from 2018, was a quiet financial hit earning a worldwide box office return of $80.5 million box office on a reported $30 million budget.

A sequel to the Gerard Butler 2018 heist thriller, “Den of Thieves 2” performed similarly to the original. The first installment, released by STX, opened with $15.2 million seven years ago.

When the first Den of Thieves came out, it did well, but not to the degree that a sequel seemed to be a given.Since its theatrical release, it’s gained so much momentum and built a devoted ...

“Den of Thieves 2,” made for about $40 million, was a bit more costly to make. Audiences liked it well enough, giving it a “B+” CinemaScore.

Den of Thieves 2 could get beat by Mufasa or Sonic the Hedgehog 3 which are looking to do about the same. The previous movie was released by STX when it was in its full glory. The sequel here with ...

“Den of Thieves 2,” made for about $40 million, was a bit more costly to make. Audiences liked it well enough, giving it a “B+” CinemaScore. Reviews (58% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) ...

“Den of Thieves 2,” made for about $40 million, was a bit more costly to make. Audiences liked it well enough, giving it a “B+” CinemaScore.

“Den of Thieves 2,” made for about $40 million, was a bit more costly to make. Audiences liked it well enough, giving it a “B+” CinemaScore. Reviews (58% fresh on Rotten Tomatoes) weren’t particularly ...

“Den of Thieves 2,” made for about $40 million, was a bit more costly to make. Audiences liked it well enough, giving it a “B+” CinemaScore.