That’s why behavioral economics can be so useful in tackling pernicious health problems. It allows us to preserve people’s ...

Scholars reflect on the continuing impact of the No Surprises Act.

The Supreme Court validates political control over public health decisions.

The Supreme Court weighs public safety concerns surrounding ghost guns in recent Second Amendment decision.

The Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision on FDA’s tobacco-authorization authority is utterly unremarkable.

A unanimous Supreme Court instructed the Fifth Circuit to reconsider the harmless error rule for agency action.

Kennedy, a case that concerns how hospitals that treat a large share of low-income patients are paid by the Medicare program.

Scholars and practitioners examine the Court’s most important regulatory decisions of this past term.

The Supreme Court preserves preventive services coverage but emboldens the HHS Secretary.

The Supreme Court allows Department of Education layoffs, a federal court upholds a mifepristone ban, and ...

When a project like the rail line has significant environmental impacts, NEPA requires a “detailed statement” that discusses the project’s negative environmental effects and reasonable alternatives.

The Supreme Court runs afoul of its own equal protection doctrine by ignoring explicit classifications.